新闻中心

11选5最佳玩法

发布于:2020-01-27 16:26:13   浏览:528278
?Legal analysis of "poke Ma beehive" incident Zhang Yanlai's online travel platform Ma beehive, which takes user UGC (original content) as its core competitiveness, is trapped in a vortex of public opinion suspected of comment plagiarism and fraud. On 21 / 21, a wechat public account sent a message, saying that after data analysis, Ma Fengwo found that he had copied 5.42 million food comments and 22.22 million Hotel Comments from Ctrip, meituan, Agoda and yelp. In response to a statement released on February 22, the number of users of the beehive described in the media articles was seriously inconsistent with the facts and the data of third-party organizations. Ma cellular said that the content of comments only accounts for 2.22% of the overall data volume of Ma cellular, and the number of accounts suspected of false comments is even smaller, which has been cleaned up. Although the wasp colony has filed a lawsuit in court, the challenge has not been resolved. The legal issues behind the events such as data handling and crawling have also become the focus of people's attention. Whether the user data of 11选5最佳玩法 comment category is protected by law is not the concept of "big data" that we usually understand, because it does not belong to the user's personal information, or reflect the user's own characteristics and behavior preferences, but the user's short comments on what they see and hear. Some people think that these evaluations belong to the protection of copyright, so the relevant rights should belong to users. However, the author does not agree with this view. It is difficult for the brief evaluation to have the originality required by copyright law, and the value of literature and art as a work for protection is not great.